Sensory and mechanical characterization
of mealy apples and woolly peaches and nectarines
Author:
Ignacio Arana *, Carmen Jarén and Silvia Arazuri
Received 5 January 2007, accepted
2 April 2007.
Abstract
Samples of apples (Malus
x domestica, Borkh) were stored at 4ºC to develop mealiness
and samples of peaches (Prunus persica, Sieb.) and nectarines
(Prunus persica, Zucc.) were stored at 6ºC to develop woolliness.
After different storage times, sensory analyses and mechanical tests were
performed. Except for the Granny Smith apple variety, all apple varieties
developed mealiness and all peach and nectarine varieties developed woolliness.
Peaches developed a moderate woolliness rate and nectarines a high one.
A correlation was established between mealiness and woolliness and other
factors such as storage time and cultivar. Mealiness and woolliness were
also related to the mechanical test variables. This relation on apples
was higher in those varieties that were more susceptible to develop mealiness,
such as ‘Top Red´ and ‘Starking´, and lower in
the ‘Golden Delicious´ variety. There was a negative correlation
between mealiness and mechanical variables from the different tests, indicators
of firmness mainly maximum resistance opposed by the fruits on the different
mechanical tests. The variables that correlated best with mealiness were
the maximum resistances opposed by the apples during the different tests.
The best mechanical test to characterize apple mealiness individually
was the shear stress rupture test. The correlation coefficient between
mealiness and maximum resistance to shear stress rupture test (N) was
higher than 0.8 with a significance level lower than 0.01. On peaches
and nectarines the relation was higher in those varieties with a higher
tendency to develop woolliness, such as ‘Red Haven´ peaches
and ‘Festina´ and ‘Fairlane´ nectarines. There
was a negative correlation between woolliness and the variables that indicate
firmness (maximum resistance, slope of the force/distance curve and area
force distance on the different tests). The variables that correlated
best with woolliness were the various maximum resistance variables registered
in the different tests. The best mechanical tests to characterize peach
and nectarine woolliness individually were the penetration test, the puncture
test and the shear stress rupture test, but the correlations between peach
and nectarine woolliness and mechanical variables were lower than in the
case of apple mealiness. A classification of the fruits (unsuitable or
not) according to their degree of sensory mealiness and woolliness was
performed. Parallel classification was done by discriminate analysis using
mechanical test variables. The accuracy of this classification and the
consistency between mechanical and sensory classifications were studied.
It is possible to conclude that sensory analysis classification (subjective,
time consuming and costly) can be substituted by an objective mechanical
classification of apples, peaches and nectarines.
Key words: Storage time, variety,
discriminate analysis, classification, firmness, texturometer.
Journal: Food, Agriculture & Environment (JFAE)
Online ISSN: 1459-0263
Year: 2007, Vol. 5, Issue 2, pages 101-106.
Publisher: WFL |
If you would like to buy just this specific document (article, review
or this journal issue), thus take contact with the Editorial Office.
Please specify the title of the article or review, issue, number and
volume.
Software and compilation © 2002 Science & Technology. All
rights reserved.
Your use of this service is governed by Terms
and Conditions. Please review our copyright
Policy for details on how we protect information that you supply.
Note to Users
The section "Articles in Press" contains peer reviewed and accepted
articles to be published in the print and/or online journal.
The requested document is freely available only to registered users
with an online subscription to Food, Agriculture & Environment.
If you have set up a personal subscription to this title please enter
your user name and password.
Copyright © 2002 Published by WFL Publisher/World Food Rd
Oy. All rights reserved.
© Meri-Rastilantie 3 B, FIN-00980 Helsinki, Finland
Tel/fax: +358 9 75 92 775. e-mail: info (at) world-food.net
Copyright
© |